5 Ways Market Acquisitions May Hurt Your Manufacturing Business
Market acquisition is changing the manufacturing software solutions market, but not always for the better. We take a closer look at its cost to...
2 min read
David Oeters : December 4, 2013 at 5:28 AM
Sometimes, you come across articles on the Internet you just have to investigate.
Here’s one. It involves robots, stolen gold, missing treasure, NASA engineers, world-renowned oceanographers, and manufacturing. A man named David Lang wanted to investigate the legend of missing gold deep underwater at the bottom of a well. He recruited Eric Stackpole, a NASA Engineer, to create a sea exploration robot, known as OpenROV, to search for the treasure. They offered free step-by-step instructions on building the robot on their website, and used crowdsourced modifications to improve the design.
Crowdsourcing and manufacturing collaboration have vastly improved the original robot, and lowered the cost. “That’s what actually makes the project so successful: rapid iteration,” one of the inventors said. “We can build one for the same price as a 1,000 (robots) and change on a dime.”
Think about that… two treasure-hunters have tapped into a problem-solving resource and found benefits that would be the envy of discrete manufacturing shop floors across the world. Customer modifications and change orders are simplified without raising costs. Quality and production improves. Best practices are collected, and overall cost drops.
Yet, manufacturers struggle to create a collaborative work environment. In fact, according to the latest estimates, manufacturing is growing less collaborative, as knowledge silos build and employees and their best practices retire and are lost. Customers are demanding custom orders that manufacturers can’t meet. Rapid iteration is difficult, if not impossible. How can a shop floor work collaboratively when they can’t even be sure if the paper-based work instructions are correct?
I read the story of Lang, Stackpole and their hunt for missing gold and recognized a few lessons manufacturing should consider in the future:
Admittedly, Lang and Stackpole don’t have much regulation to worry about and amazingly low overhead, but there is a benefit to collaboration the industry is recognizing. The ideas presented here shouldn’t be seen as a checklist for collaborative success, but goals that will help foster a more collaborative manufacturing enterprise.
Have you considered collaborative manufacturing before? If so, what steps have you taken to create a shop floor that works collaboratively or uses crowdsourcing? Let us know!
Market acquisition is changing the manufacturing software solutions market, but not always for the better. We take a closer look at its cost to...
As manufacturers struggle to find qualified shop floor workers, it’s not enough to hope secondary education will improve. It’s time to start finding...
Understanding the CIMx Vision for Paperless Manufacturing offers an insider’s view of what drives us to make the best product for our customers, and...